strategieshaa.blogg.se

Fastcopy vs teracopy
Fastcopy vs teracopy







My system is a brand new Dell OptiPlex 3010 with Windows 7 Ultimate 64-bit, core i5 3.20 GHz, 8GM RAM, 1TB HDD. At any rate, I really appreciate the effort the developer(s) put into it. One final note, which may or may not be relevant: for some reason, this program seems to have taken an excessively long time to copy large amounts of data using the default settings.Īs stated before, I have used this program many times before without any trouble, so I'm not sure why it was problematic for me this time. This ultimately required a reboot, which seemed excessive. FastCopy allows you to specify actions based on a files age, size, and name, among others. Compare price, features, and reviews of the software side-by-side to make the best choice for your business. After researching the problem, I ran the setup.exe file to uninstall, but it failed to uninstall properly - leaving behind a message that I'd have to find & delete a dll file, then delete the folder. Second, there was no uninstall entry in Revo or in Windows. I'm the only account on the computer and have full administrative privileges with UAC turned completely off, so not sure why this was a problem. When you’re copying a shit tonne of files, being able to know exactly where shit went wrong is incredibly valuable. For years this was my go-to program for replacing Windows' lackluster native copypaste function, but with Windows 7 Ultimate 64-bit there seems to be some issues.įirst, I couldn't get the shell extension to operate reliably or even stay selected. Definitely do not trust windows file transfer. On XP - perhaps, but on Windows 7 and up FastCopy and TeraCopy are both slower than or marginally comparable to robocopy, which is a built-in bulk copying.









Fastcopy vs teracopy